IT DOESN’T TAKE A PRESIDENT

IWUZ mottoIWUZ driving to the store to buy a video camera when I flipped on the radio andDave 07 heard;  ——“gunman is dead”. I hoped it was an update on an old case; but it wasn’t.

I have eight grandchildren, and although they are all older than the children at Sandy Hook school; some are the same age as the victims of Columbine. Hug your family.

As I listened to the unfolding horror; 27 dead; 18 of them elementary school children; it occurred to me; “They can’t protect us. They never could”.

Who do I mean by “they”? I mean our government; our bureaucrats; our police; our teachers. None of them ever could really protect us, but for some reason we have turned more and more of our lives, freedoms, and responsibilities over to them.

The result is that we no longer feel the same sense of involvement with with our neighbors that we once did. Nor with their kids. Our kids.

In a famous speech, Hillary Clinton once quoted the African proverb that it takes a village to raise a child.

She said: “Right now there are parents questioning a popular culture that glamorizes sex and violence, smoking and drinking, and teaches children that the logos on their clothes are more valued than the generosity in their hearts.

She went on to say: ”And we have learned that to raise a happy, healthy and hopeful child, it takes a family, it takes teachers, it takes clergy, it takes business people, it takes community leaders, it takes those who protect our health and safety, it takes all of us. “Yes, it takes a village”.

So far, so good.

But then, speaking about her husband Bill, she said: “It also takes a President”.

No, actually, it doesn’t. If only she had stopped with the village. If only our previous governments had stopped with the village; maybe even helped the village, and let the village help the people.

But for the last 70 years, Presidents, and Prime Ministers, and Premiers, and Governors, have “helped” everyone where there might be a possibility to gain votes; and they brought with them an army of bureaucrats, lobbyists; lawyers, and experts in everything to run our lives.

So now, the people of the village hardly know each other because the government is looking after us, all the time, and everywhere; so we don’t really need each other as much as we used to.

Except that they can’t look after us cradle to grave; and we do still need each other. More than ever.

Look at the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy on Staten Island. The Federal Emergency management Agency, (FEMA), was there almost immediately; for photo-ops. Neighbors – from as far away as Oklahoma, were there to help.

And it won’t be governments; but family, friends, and neighbors that will really help grieving families go through this one.

In the end, we can’t always prevent tragedy, but by being involved we can reduce the risk; and we can deal more effectively with the aftermath of tragedy when it does strike.

It doesn’t take a President.

It does take the village.

Let’s go back, for our children’s future.

Dave

6 Comments on “IT DOESN’T TAKE A PRESIDENT”

  1. Paul Weisberg December 15, 2012 at 4:38 PM #

    Amen! Excellent blog!

    • davewr2012 December 15, 2012 at 10:09 PM #

      Thanks Paul.
      I am not anti-government. But we have allowed them to go way beyond what is necessary to an extent that is extremely counter-productive; and we need to roll them back. It will be a task, because no bureaucracy ever went on a diet voluntarily.
      But I’m convinced that with the power of the internet and social media’, we can make it happen. The Let’s Do It Ourselves Movement, (LDIO el-D-o) is being launched in early 2013 to give us a vehicle to do just that.
      Dave

  2. Randall J Morrison December 16, 2012 at 10:56 AM #

    I think you point out one of the flaws in democracy: politicians and their parties offer to enact policy and spend tax money so they will get elected not necessarily because it is good for our nation as a whole. I think corporations and unions should not be allowed to contribute to political parties, only individuals should (and with limits). TV ads should be banned so that the uninformed voter cannot be swayed by the vulgar American-style ads that manipulate voters as well as common advertising campaigns manipulate the emotionally bankrupt people of the “shopper” culture. Advertisers can make just about anyone believe anything beyond all logic. Make elections about real issues presented directly to real people in actual “town hall” meetings, face to face. Enough of money buying power!!

    • davewr2012 December 16, 2012 at 11:11 AM #

      Thanks Randall. I agree 100% with everything you said. Say it on the blog and I’ll put it up! (I’d put it up even if I didn’t agree, but it’s more fun when I do) Dave

  3. Derryck December 17, 2012 at 3:33 PM #

    Great piece, cuz!

    • davewr2012 December 17, 2012 at 5:30 PM #

      Thanks!
      I think Obama did the right thing by showing up and expressing the sympathy and concern of the American people. Now he should stay away and let the families and communities work through this. The Federal government can help, by getting out of the way.
      But I do think, that Republicans and Democrats should get together and consider whether Madison, had he been able to look into the future when he wrote the Second Amendment; and had he seen automatic weapons with dozens of rounds in the clips; if he might not have elaborated a bit more on what “the right to bear arms”, and, “a well regulated militia” meant.
      The Founding Fathers were, if anything, men possessing common sense.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: